It’s a Miracle

Another way to see the distinct difference between Islam and Christianity is to view miracles. How are miracles treated within each religion, and more importantly, what is their purpose?

Within Islam, there are not miracles in the same way that Christians think of miracles as retold in the Bible. In Islam, the Qur’an itself is the miracle. In fact, when people asked Muhammad for a miracle, he told them to read the Qur’an (Qur’an 29-50-51; 17:88-94). Again, to restate this to be clear, from the Muslim perspective, the Qur’an is the miracle. In fact, the Arabic word for “sign” is “ayat,” the same word that refers to a verse of the Qur’an. These words are the same because from a Muslim point of view, each ayat of the Qur’an is a sign from Allah. As Ahmed Deedat, a well-known recent Muslim apologist said:

“Again and again when miracles are demanded from the prophet of God by the cynical and frivolous few, he is made to point to the qur`an – message from high – as ‘the miracle.’ The miracle of miracles! And men of wisdom, people with literary and spiritual insight, who were honest enough to themselves, recognised and accepted al-qur`an as a genuine miracle.” [i]

To better understand the Muslim mindset, imagine that instead of using the word “verse,” we referred to each passage of the Bible as miraculous. Each time a preacher took to a podium to begin reading a chapter, he would tell us to turn to book such-and-such, chapter so-and so, miracle number 1. Therefore, in order to examine Muhammad’s “miracle” of bringing the Qur’an, we must view the Qur’an itself. Since the Qur’an itself is the miracle, we are forced to examine some of its passages to see what kind of miracle Muhammad was given. We will do so, at the same time comparing these to the miracles of Christ. As always, while doing so, we will be alert to what kind of doctrinal reversals or inversions we may encounter.

Looking back to Christ, consider the miracles He performed. He gave sight to a blind man (John 9), raised a man from the dead (John 11), healed a paralytic (Mark 2), and fed thousands of people with a couple pieces of fish and bread (Matthew 14). Now let’s look at Muhammad’s miracle, delivering the Qur’an. Close inspection reveals a very different type of miracle when turning the pages of the Qur’an. Muhammad’s miracle states that Muslims should ask for permission before leaving Muhammad at a big event (Qur’an 24:62). Muhammad’s wives would receive double punishment for indecency (Qur’an 33:30). Muhammad was able to take more wives than other Muslims (Qur’an 33:50). Muhammad was allowed to marry his adopted son’s wife (Qur’an 33:37). Visitors to Muhammad’s house were explicitly told to leave right after dinner so as not to be an annoyance (Qur’an 33:53). Private criticism of Muhammad is forbidden. (Qur’an 58:9). Finally, people speaking to Muhammad should do so in a soft voice (Qur’an 49:2).

A distinct pattern becomes evident. All of the miracles of Jesus were to help other people. Never once did He perform a miracle that aided his own earthly status as a human. He never once made food to feed himself, used miracles to amuse Himself, or gave Himself special permission for something by supernatural means. Indeed, such use of miracles for Jesus’ own comfort and benefit were proffered by Satan in the wilderness and therefore temptations to sin (Matthew 4:1-11). Even in the case where Jesus had Peter catch two fish to pay the two drachma tax, Jesus emphasizes that this isn’t for His own benefit, but rather to keep others from being offended (Matthew 17:27).

On the other hand, in the case of Muhammad, many of his miraculous Qur’anic recitations were rather convenient to his earthly existence. Even one of Muhammad’s wives noted this:

Narrated Hisham’s father:
Khaula bint Hakim was one of those ladies who presented themselves to the Prophet for marriage. ‘Aisha said, “Doesn’t a lady feel ashamed for presenting herself to a man?” But when the Verse: “(O Muhammad) You may postpone (the turn of) any of them (your wives) that you please,’ (33.51) was revealed, ” ‘Aisha said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! I do not see, but, that your Lord hurries in pleasing you.'” [ii]

One thousand four hundred years later, it’s hard to know how much sarcasm Muhammad’s wife voiced in the above passage. What isn’t difficult to see is that Aisha recognized the quickness in which Muhammad’s life was made more convenient and enjoyable at the revelation of this particular verse of the Qur’an. The miracle of the Qur’an made Muhammad’s earthly life more pleasant, whereas the miracles of Jesus made other people’s lives better. Indeed, we find the two historical figures in diametric opposition to each other. Jesus performed miracles to the benefit of others and never for Himself. In fact, oftentimes Jesus’ miracles were done at a cost to Himself. Ultimately, the miracle of Jesus’ resurrection was done at the cost of a torturous death. Alternately, Muhammad’s miracle of the Qur’an made his own life more comfortable.

Why is there this discrepancy? What does this say about these two miracle workers? Is one type of miracle more deserving of our respect than the other, and if so, why? This can be a great segue into the sacrificial work of Jesus. These are questions where the contrast between Jesus and Muhammad can be discussed delicately to show their vast differences.

[i] Quote from Achmed Deedat, reprinted on http://www.jannah.org/articles/qurdeed.html, Accessed April 26, 2009

[ii] Sahih Bukhari: Volume 7, Book 62, Number 48

Posted in Unraveling_Islam | Tagged | 4 Comments

The Hijra and the Cross

How many times have I heard someone state that Christians and Muslims worship the same God? Christians and Muslims both pray, both fast, both have a holy book, and both are commanded to obey their respective moral codes. Yet the more I learned about Islam, the more it seemed evident that key differences of a severe nature existed. Those differences are neither just details of observance nor minor issues of practice. Rather, those differences are profound and yet subtle enough that they require a bit of investigation to bring them out. Moreover, those differences when viewed in succession reveal a sinister pattern that becomes clear to the thoughtful reader. But back to the main point, as Ravi Zacharias said “I often hear the question posed wrongly, ‘Aren’t all religions fundamentally the same and superficially different?’ No. They are fundamentally different and at best they are superficially similar.”

Fundamentally different is a grand statement. To test such a hypothesis, let’s look closely at the pivotal event of each religion and contrast them. Let’s identify the defining moment of each religion and then put them side by side. How would these two events oppose or parallel each another?

The foundational event in Christianity is the crucifixion (and subsequent resurrection) of Jesus Christ. Everything in the gospels leads up to the cross. Each gospel gives an especially inordinate amount of space to Jesus’ last few days on earth. The cross is pivotal; for it is by the atoning death of Jesus that our sins can be forgiven. It is His subsequent resurrection that proves Jesus was who He claimed to be, and that He has the authority to forgive sins. The crucifixion is the pinnacle of Jesus’ work, for by it finally He could say, “It is accomplished.” From the standpoint of the earliest apostles, it was of prime importance (1 Corinthians 15:3-4). Indeed, the cross is emblematic of Christianity more than anything else. No other event in Jesus’ life approaches the significance of what He achieved on the cross.

What is the pivotal moment in Islam? Was it perhaps the birth or death of Muhammad? Was it the day he first claimed to have received revelations from an angel who identified himself as Gabriel? As it turns out, the critical moment in Islam is the hijra, or migration. Muhammad originally lived in Mecca and suffered various forms of persecution. He became aware of a plot to assassinate him. Muhammad slipped away that very night and with a small band of followers fled the city of Mecca for Medina. After arriving at Medina, Islam as a faith began to grow, Muhammad gathered many more followers, and years later, triumphantly returned to Mecca with an army. The hijra was the turning point in Islam, and this is uniformly acknowledged by Muslim scholars. For example, Ibrahim B. Syed, Ph. D. says, “There is no doubt whatsoever that the migration of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to Madinah was the crucial event, which established the Islamic civilization.”[i] Shamim A Siddiqi makes the case that the hijra “is a corner stone or the turning point of the process of the Islamic Movement for the establishment of Allah’s Deen”, and he quotes Mohammad Hussain Haikal as saying, “Caliph Umar took Hijrah as the greatest event of the Islamic history when Rasulullah [the prophet of Allah] migrated from Makkah to Madinah.”[ii] So critical is the hijra that the Islamic calendar starts there. From an Islamic point of view, this article is written in the year 1433 A.H (anno hijra). Starting a calendar by this event certainly testifies to its place of prestige in the Islamic mindset.

So what happens when the cross and the hijra are considered simultaneously? The cross is all about Jesus embracing persecution. The hijra was about Muhammad fleeing from it. Jesus’ disciples learned of His impending death (Matthew 16:21), they wanted Jesus to glorify Himself without the cross (Matthew 16:22), but Jesus would have nothing of it (Matthew 16:23). He was willing to accept the Father’s plan, regardless of the cost (Luke 22:42). In contrast, Muhammad, when confronted with paying the ultimate price, planned his getaway. He hatched a plot to have one of his followers take his place at his house to divert attention while he made his escape. [iii] His response could not have been any more dissimilar to that of Jesus.

Some people may argue that there were times when Jesus avoided being captured by the crowds, and indeed this is so (Luke 4:29-30). So too there were times when Muhammad, with an army behind him, was courageous in the face of battle. However, such objections miss the entire point. Regardless of any of these specific times or places, what is being discussed is the central moment, the pivotal event, upon which each religion hinges. For Christianity, it is Jesus accepting the persecution which awaited Him. In Islam, it is Muhammad running from it. Upon inspection, we find the religions are not just different, but that they are totally opposite. The defining moments in each religion are a complete antithesis of each other. What Muhammad did at the critical juncture of Islam is the exact reversal of what Jesus did at the pinnacle of His time as God on earth.

[i] http://www.irfi.org/articles/articles_451_500/significance_of_the_hijrah.htm)

Posted in Unraveling_Islam | Tagged , , | 4 Comments