The Worship of Muhammad – Part Three

The worship of Muhammad comes into focus in some unusual places. Consider the Islamic law regarding the image of Muhammad himself. Islamic law forbids that any representation of Muhammad be drawn, painted, or otherwise shown. Yet where does this prohibition come from? No verse of the Qur’an states that such representations of Muhammad cannot be made. Of course, the Hadith give more detail on what can and cannot be done within Islam. Strangely enough, when the Hadith are examined, no prohibition of drawing or painting an image of Muhammad is there either. Instead we find a general prohibition against any images of human beings whatsoever.

Sahih Muslim, Book 024, Number 5268:
Ibn ‘Umar reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) having said: Those who paint pictures would be punished on the Day of Resurrection and it would be said to them: Breathe soul into what you have created. [i]

So Islamic law maintains that the prohibition is extended to the representation of any person, not just Muhammad. Yet this Islamic tradition of not allowing images of people seems to get ignored with regard to the average person and amplified in relation to Muhammad, even though he is not singled out in any of the original Islamic texts. Then why do Muslims forbid any such representations of Muhammad? Muslim authors are quick to point out that the reasoning behind not having any images of Muhammad is to prevent later followers from worshipping him. That seems a fair statement, so let’s see where it leads and how it plays out in real life.

Many people have discussed this issue in relation to the Danish cartoons of Muhammad and the ensuing controversy, but here let’s move right past that to the road less travelled. In 1977, Anthony Quinn starred in a little-known movie called “Muhammad, Messenger of God,” or alternatively titled “The Messenger.” [ii] Directed by a Syrian born Muslim and approved by the renowned Al-Azhar university, the personage of Muhammad is never shown. It’s odd to watch an entire full-length feature film about Muhammad without ever seeing him. The movie shows the actions and movements of his followers and his enemies during the inception of Islam as a religion. Everyone else is represented, but not Muhammad. He is given unique status in that throughout the movie his character is never depicted on camera. In the movie’s introduction, the following reason is given,

“The makers of this film honor the Islamic tradition which holds that the impersonation of the prophet offends against the spirituality of his message. Therefore, the person of Muhammad will not be shown.”

Here again the irony of Islamic thought comes straight to the forefront. In an attempt to prevent the worship of Muhammad, he gets elevated to a special status no other character is given. He has been raised to a level beyond any other man. Just as God Himself cannot be seen face to face, so too Muhammad receives the same status from the cinematography point of view. What likely started with genuine concerns has had massive unintended consequence. The very attempt to prevent the worship of Muhammad has caused his undisplayed image to become an object of worship. Perhaps this seems a stretch to some readers, but consider how the Hadith describe Muhammad’s physical appearance,

Sahih Muslim, Book 030, Number 5772:
Al-Bara’ reported that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) had the most handsome face amongst men and he had the best disposition and he was neither very tall nor short-statured. [iii]

His likeness is deemed so amazing that it surpassed all other men. Again, while this isn’t technically worship in a strict theological sense, it sure comes across as such. Perhaps most striking is a line from the movie itself. As the movie unfolds where Muhammad goes unseen throughout, one of the characters aptly states, “The real god is unseen.” This author could not agree more.

Muslims grant Muhammad the same status as God Himself with regards to the representation of His image. In the Muslim attempt to avoid idolatry, they have inadvertently created a new and powerful unseen idol.

In the last installment of this series, more explicit Hadith will be unpacked which are nothing short of shocking.

[i] http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=024&translator=2&start=0&number=5268

[ii] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074896/

[iii] http://www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=030&translator=2&start=118&number=5770

Posted in Unraveling_Islam | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Worship of Muhammad, Part Two

In the previous article, it was noted that the fundamental Islamic creed requires belief in Muhammad. Becoming a Muslim requires an explicit statement to show confidence in Muhammad as a prophet. Additionally, it was shown how the Qur’an mandates obedience not just to Allah, but to Muhammad as well.

In this article, the Qur’an itself will be examined in more detail. As will be shown shortly, the Qur’an undermines its own position by lumping Allah and Muhammad into the same category on a variety of occasions. Muhammad and Allah are mentioned together in some rather awkward occurrences which convey theological meaning. Let’s examine a few of these. Those presented here are but a brief snapshot. The Qur’an implies equality between Muhammad and Allah on a number of points, and we must not ignore them. While many of these passages do not necessarily conclude by themselves that Muhammad is deified, the set as a whole paints a very clear picture of the role that Muhammad plays within Islam.

For example, swearing allegiance to Muhammad is the same as doing so to Allah.

Qur’an 048.010
Verily those who plight their fealty to thee do no less than plight their fealty to Allah:

As another example, obedience to Muhammad and to Allah are considered one in the same.

Qur’an 004.080
He who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah.

In this following verse, notice that a Muslim’s love for not just Allah, but Muhammad as well must surpass even that of his or her own family.

Qur’an 009.024
Say: If it be that your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your mates, or your kindred; the wealth that ye have gained; the commerce in which ye fear a decline: or the dwellings in which ye delight – are dearer to you than Allah, or His Messenger, or the striving in His cause;- then wait until Allah brings about His decision: and Allah guides not the rebellious.

To recap, the Qur’an states that a pledge to Muhammad is the equivalent of a pledge to Allah, commands the same level of obedience to Muhammad as to Allah, and requires love for both Muhammad and Allah to surpass that of anything else in your life, including family and spouse. If that isn’t worship, what is?

The skeptical reader may object that while these arguments are somewhat damning, today’s Muslims don’t truly believe Muhammad is a god. It is true no Muslim thinks they treat Muhammad as a god. Yet Muslims unwittingly deify Muhammad with their own words. For example, Dr. Muzammil H. Siddiqi, describes Muhammad this way:

“Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) practiced what he preached. He very carefully and meticulously followed the Qur’an, Allah’s Word that was revealed to him. He followed and lived the Qur’an at every moment in every detail of his life. His life was the reflection of Allah’s Words. He became the Qur’an in person, the embodiment of the Qur’an, or one may even say in a metaphorical sense ‘the Word in flesh’” [i]

The term “the Word in flesh” should instantly call Scripture to mind. The true Word in flesh is described in John 1:14:

14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.

The Muslims who criticize Christians for believing Jesus is the Word made flesh believe that Muhammad is the “Word in flesh”. How ironic it is that the Islamic religion, one so depending upon a man, lambastes Christianity for worshipping a man. Of course since Jesus is also God, Christians are not polytheistic, since we worship God only. Yet the tables have been oddly turned, in that Christians are being falsely accused of the very thing Muslims do. Muslims decry polytheism as heresy, and yet simultaneously elevate Muhammad, a mere man, to a status where he receives many of the special privileges otherwise due only to God.

Once again we see that Islam has taken Christianity and flipped it upside down, inside out, and irrevocably twisted it out of recognition. God became man in order to deliver us, and as such, we worship God alone. Yet another inversion has occurred. The same people who mistakenly accuse Christians of worshiping a man are locked into a system where they do not realize nor admit that they do exactly what they prohibit. The inversions just keep coming.

In Part three and four of this series, the Hadith will be considered. The deification of Muhammad will be seen in its most clear and blatant forms.

[i] http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=200805025178

Posted in Unraveling_Islam | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Worship of Muhammad – Part One

I have been asked many times in the past few days about my thoughts on the uprisings in Egypt and Libya. In short, the issue is not solely political, but theological as well. Since this blog is not about politics, I will take the road less traveled. What exactly is the Muslim’s view of Muhammad that causes such visceral reactions?

Muslims complain that Christians believe in and worship “a man.” Closer examination of how Muslims treat Muhammad offers yet another bizarre twist when comparing Islam and Christianity. While Muslims technically do not worship Muhammad, in many ways their actions tell a much different tale. Everything from the Islamic creed, to how Muslims behave in everyday life, to the Qur’an itself appears a lot like Muhammad worship.

In this first of a four part series on the worship of Muhammad, consider the shahada, the Muslim creed. To become a Muslim, a person must recite the shahada in Arabic. Roughly translated, the shahada is as follows,

“I bear witness that there is no god but Allah, and I bear witness that Mohammad is the messenger of Allah”

Notice that this is a two part testimony. Of course Muslims believe that there is no god but Allah, but look at the rest of the shahada. Part two of the Muslim creed is that you must also believe that Muhammad brought the message of Allah.

Consider these words within a Muslim tract discussing the shahada,

“The second part of the Shahada means that Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) is the servant and chosen messenger of Allah. No one must have two opinions about this matter.” [i]

From the Muslim perspective, a person who believes in the concept of God without believing that Muhammad brought “the” message is not a Muslim. In other words, believing in Allah is not enough to be called a Muslim. A Muslim must also believe that Muhammad is Allah’s messenger. So what was that message? One part of it is that Muhammad’s actions are to be followed as closely as possible (Qur’an 33:21). This means, by corollary, Islam requires belief “in a man.” Some readers may think this an overextension of Islamic doctrine. Yet consider what the Qur’an itself has to say on the issue of belief,

[49.15] The believers are only those who believe in Allah and His Apostle then they doubt not and struggle hard with their wealth and their lives in the way of Allah; they are the truthful ones.

Muslims must believe both in Allah as well as Muhammad, his apostle. It is true that the way in which Muslims are to believe in Muhammad is very different than the way a Christian is commanded to believe in Jesus. However, Christians are not required to state a creed that they believe that Isaiah and Haggai are prophets in order to be a Christian. Of course, we do believe they are prophets, but stating it isn’t part of any Christian confession. In contrast, if a Muslim does not believe in Muhammad, he is not a Muslim and cannot go to paradise, thus making the religion of Islam oddly coupled to a man. Not only is the belief in Muhammad as the messenger stressed from the positive standpoint as referenced in the previously cited passage of the Qur’an, but unbelief in Muhammad is stressed from the negative standpoint in many passages as well. Hellfire is guaranteed for those who do not believe in and obey both Allah AND his apostle.

[4.14] And whoever disobeys Allah and His Apostle and goes beyond His limits, He will cause him to enter fire to abide in it, and he shall have an abasing chastisement.

The instructions Muslims receive on how to lead their lives result in worship of Muhammad in every way but name only. To understand this, we must recognize that Islamic doctrine is such that belief in God alone gives Muslims no rules for life. The Qur’an gives some instructions, but in a vacuum it doesn’t have nearly enough detail to allow for a workable system to live out faith. A devout Muslim therefore must look to Muhammad, whose life is the only one believed to be of sufficient record to be followed as the premier example. This is becoming obvious even to Muslims, and when a Muslim dares state it, he may be branded heretical. This next quote is from such an accused Muslim, Anna Jordan. Please remember this is not some Christian author discussing perceptions of Muslims; this is a Muslim describing the state of her own religion.

While they have adamantly insisted they do not deify Mohammed, they have sought to supplement God’s word by looking for guidance in the words and actions of Mohammed, thereby elevating the prophet to a status never ordained by God. [ii]

For a religion which stresses not believing in “a man,” it seems strange that the creed of initiation must include him and that the holy book requires obedience to him. Muslims are inadvertently doing exactly what they loudly proclaim must not be done. In the next part of this series, the Qur’an will be examined in more detail as to how it equates Allah and Muhammad in some rather compromising comparisons.

[i] http://www.islamworld.net/docs/become.html

[ii] http://www.islamunraveled.org/islam-myths/other-religions/james-quran-intro.php

Posted in Unraveling_Islam | Tagged , | 20 Comments